In addition to isothermal intercritical annealing discussed above, the study of cyclic α→γ and γ→α transformations in the intercritical range is a good method to investigate the growth kinetics in medium-Mn steels. There are certain advantages in studying cyclic phase transformations. The first is that growth can be isolated and studied exclusively without the intervention of nucleation. The second stems from the fact that α→γ and γ→α transformations proceed at different rates isothermally, and, therefore, cyclic transformations can provide insight in the growth kinetics. The cyclic transformations were studied in a Fe-0.2C-5Mn steel (Sarafoglou et al. 2015). The cyclic thermal treatment considered is depicted in Figure 1a. The cycle starts with an isothermal holding at T_{is}=675^{o}C followed by temperature cycling between T_{max}=710^{o}C and T_{min}=640^{o}C. The heating and cooling rates were 10^{o}C/min. It is important to note that the time were the cyclic transformations starts is important, since the cyclic transformations depend on the previous conditions established during isothermal holding at T_{is}. Therefore, isothermal intercritical annealing was simulated first and then the start of the cyclic transformations was chosen accordingly. The isothermal α→γ and γ→α transformations are depicted in Fig.1b. Compared with the α→γ, the γ→α transformation is much slower. Two specific times, t_{s}, were identified as the start of the cyclic transformations. In the first case t_{s}=1x10^{8} sec after equilibrium volume fractions for both austenite and ferrite have been established in the isothermal transformation. In the second case, t_{s}=2x10^{3} sec, where the α→γ transformation is evolving while the γ→α transformation is very sluggish. These times are depicted by dotted lines in Figure 2b. The cyclic transformations are depicted in Fig.2a and 2b for the times t_{s}=1x10^{8} sec and t_{s}=2x10^{3} sec respectively. In Fig.3a the volume fraction forms hysteresis loops. Point A marks the beginning and point B the end of the cyclic transformation. The loops move upwards indicating that more austenite forms at every cycle. An additional feature of the cyclic behavior is the “inverse” transformation, where the transformation proceeds to a direction opposite to the temperature change. This behavior is depicted by CD for T_{max} and EF for T_{min} in Fig.3a. The cyclic transformation for t_{s}=2x10^{3} sec is depicted in Fig.3b. Since in this case at t_{s}=2x10^{3} sec, the γ→α transformation during the isothermal treatment (Fig.2b) is sluggish, the volume fraction during cyclic transformation does not form hysteresis loops. On the contrary the volume fraction increases in each cycle, both in the heating and cooling part. In this case austenite forms by inverse transformation during the cooling part of the cycle.

**Contributors**: P.I. Sarafoglou, M.I.T. Tzizi and G.N. Haidemenopoulos

**Reference**: P.I. Sarafoglou, M.I.T. Tzini and G.N. Haidemenopoulos, Simulation of cyclic transformations in the intercritical range of a 5Mn steel, Int. Journal of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 2015 (accepted, in press).

Fig.1a |
Fig.1b |

Fig.2a |
Fig.2b |